New York Dram Shop Act

Last reviewed September 2026

New York ties civil liability to an unlawful sale under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, most often a sale to a visibly intoxicated person or a minor, that caused or contributed to the intoxication. Video and service records establish what was visible and what was served.

General Obligations Law §§ 11-101 and 11-100; Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65

General Obligations Law § 11-101, the Dram Shop Act, gives any person injured in person, property, means of support, or otherwise by an intoxicated person, or by reason of the intoxication of any person, a right of action against any person who, by unlawfully selling to or unlawfully assisting in procuring liquor for the intoxicated person, caused or contributed to such intoxication. The sale is “unlawful” when it violates Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 65, which prohibits selling, delivering, or giving away alcohol to any person under 21, to any visibly intoxicated person, or to any habitual drunkard known to be such.

General Obligations Law § 11-100 separately creates liability for any person who knowingly causes intoxication by unlawfully furnishing alcohol to, or unlawfully assisting in procuring alcohol for, a person under 21.

Standard for liability

For adults, the plaintiff must show an unlawful sale, typically to a visibly intoxicated person, and that the sale caused or contributed to the intoxication that produced the injury. New York courts require evidence that intoxication was visible at the time of the sale; a high blood-alcohol reading alone is generally not enough, and the plaintiff need not show the venue’s alcohol was the sole cause. Claims under § 11-101 are brought by third parties; the intoxicated person’s own claim is generally barred.

Social hosts

Section 11-101 applies to commercial sales. Social hosts are reached by § 11-100 only when they knowingly furnish alcohol to, or assist in procuring alcohol for, a person under 21. New York does not impose social-host liability for serving intoxicated adults.

Minors

Sale to a person under 21 is an unlawful sale under ABC Law § 65 and supports a § 11-101 claim against a licensee; § 11-100 reaches anyone who knowingly furnishes to a minor. Identification procedures, ID-scanner logs, and door practices are the operational evidence. ABC Law § 65-b addresses acceptable forms of identification.

Training, responsible-vendor, and safe-harbor provisions

The State Liquor Authority certifies Alcohol Training Awareness Program (ATAP) providers. ATAP is not mandatory statewide and is not a statutory civil defense, but the Authority may consider an employee’s ATAP training as a mitigating factor in disciplinary proceedings for sales to minors or intoxicated persons, and a licensee’s training program bears on how the venue was run. Preston holds New York ATAP, TAM, and responsible-vendor certifications.

Operational evidence commonly examined in New York cases

• Video showing the patron’s condition at each sale, from the server’s vantage point
• POS and tab records establishing what was sold, when, and by whom
• Identification procedures and ID-scanner logs for underage claims
• ATAP and other training records for staff on duty
• Written policies on cut-off, refusal, and identification
• Staffing schedules and manager coverage
• State Liquor Authority disciplinary history and incident reports

The expert’s role

New York cases turn on visibility: what a bartender or server could see about the patron’s condition at the moment of sale. The operations expert reconstructs the sequence of sales, identifies the vantage point of each server, and explains what a trained server should have recognized and done under recognized practice and the venue’s own policies. Preston holds New York ATAP, TAM, and responsible-vendor certifications.

Primary sources

• Gen. Oblig. Law § 11-101, nysenate.gov
• Gen. Oblig. Law § 11-100, nysenate.gov
• Alco. Bev. Cont. Law § 65, nysenate.gov
• New York State Liquor Authority, ATAP, sla.ny.gov

Questions counsel ask